From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail19b.g19.rapidsite.net (mail19b.dulles19-verio.com [204.202.242.88]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06EB767B18 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:57:53 +1100 (EST) Received: from mx41.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.76) by mail19b.g19.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 2-0643446667 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:57:50 -0500 (EST) From: "Russell McGuire" To: Subject: GNU and Freescale MPC83xx / e300 core support? Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:57:41 -0800 Message-ID: <000301c6418a$86b32ee0$6405a8c0@absolut> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I was recently involved in a meeting with a Freescale FAE, which informed us that the current revisions of the GNU C/C++ compilers do not yet possess any optimizations for the MPC83xx cores, more precisely no optimizations for the e300 cores inside the MPC83xx line up. They did say it was 100% backwards compatible with the existing 603e / 6xx core support, so all the code should work just fine. I was curious if anyone out there was aware of any efforts to produce / patch any of the GNU compilers to have optimizations for these newer MPC83xx's with the e300 cores? Thanks, -Russ