From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8350DE29B for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:09:25 +1100 (EST) From: "Sean Hefty" To: "'Caitlin Bestler'" , "Joachim Fenkes" References: <469958e00712131122s661dd970ud359389e1c6637d4@mail.gmail.com> <78C9135A3D2ECE4B8162EBDCE82CAD7702B14004@nekter> Subject: RE: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: SerializeHCA-related hCalls on POWER5 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:48:40 -0800 Message-ID: <000301c83dd1$ec49d520$9b37170a@amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <78C9135A3D2ECE4B8162EBDCE82CAD7702B14004@nekter> Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Roland Dreier , LKML , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, OF-General , Stefan Roscher List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >To clarify, an FMR Work Request is simply posted to the SendQ like >any other Work Request (of course the QP has to be privileged, or >it will complete in error). An SQ Post should never block. FMR's as defined by the IB spec and that created by Mellanox are not the same. They, unfortunately, use the same name and acronym only. Mellanox FMRs use an API that is more like that of standard MRs. - Sean