LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tom Curran" <tcurran@ultsol.com>
To: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: RE: On the MPC85xx development boards
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:40:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000601c45a12$469704f0$6601a8c0@curranusi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088085327022.mikko.alutoin.17388.vROgRbiXwfx6jgnkf5FAxQ@luukku.com>


You might also want to check out Artis Microsystems for MPC85xx devel
boards:
http://www.artismicro.com/

--Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
[mailto:owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org]On Behalf Of Mikko
Alutoin
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 6:55 AM
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: On the MPC85xx development boards



Hi folks!

I would be happy to receive some comments on pros & cons of different
development boards for MPC85xx cause I'm in the process of selecting one.
The final design will be using MPC8560 to implement a 1 Gbps Ethernet card
for a router. ATM support will be needed later on.
The development environment includes a Linux PC and Abatron BDI2000
emulator.

Here are the boards that I am aware of:

1)	MPC8560ADS by Motorola
2)	CW8540DSEVAL by Motorola
3)	SBC8560 by Windriver
4)	Silicon Tx GP3 8560
5)	MPC8540 RDK by GDATech

Are these boards all there is?

I am under the impression that 1, 2, 4 and 5 (but not 3) come with a Linux
BSP included? Is this correct?

Being the lazy person that I am, I'm trying to minimize the work to get
Linux up and running on the board. I wonder which board/package gives me
least headache? Are there any pitfalls that I should know about?

Let us assume that the final product will not be based on a commercial
Embedded Linux distro, but a custom 2.6 kernel with busybox & uclibc. Should
that effect the choice in any way?

Forgive me if the questions seem a bit foolish. The bottom line is that I
have not used any kind of development boards in the past and I would like to
receive some insight on which one of the above to choose.

Cheers,
Mikko


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-24 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-24 13:55 On the MPC85xx development boards Mikko Alutoin
2004-06-24 17:40 ` Tom Curran [this message]
2004-06-24 18:37 ` Dan Malek
2004-06-25  7:08 ` David Woodhouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-02 12:42 Mikko Alutoin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000601c45a12$469704f0$6601a8c0@curranusi' \
    --to=tcurran@ultsol.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox