From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Green To: greyham@research.canon.com.au (Graham Stoney) Subject: Re: Journeyman configure/build options for gcc & glibc? Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:02:59 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org (LinuxPPC Embedded Mailing List) References: <20000817031630.9089F238@elph.research.canon.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20000817031630.9089F238@elph.research.canon.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00081708261200.01481@minotaur.mvista.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Graham Stoney wrote: > I tried upgrading my root filesystem from Journeyman > to 1.2, and now binaries built with my compiler work correctly with the HHL1.2 > libraries. I never saw any varargs problems between my gcc-2.95.2 and > glibc-2.1.3 once the other 8xx fixes were applied (the same ones that are > now in the 1.2 SRPMs), so perhaps whatever got "fixed" in Journeyman was a bad > mod that got backed out again for 1.2. > > Anyway, I'm happy. OK, I'm glad to hear that. > My only gripe about the otherwise excellent Hard Hat kit > is the ugly symlink from /opt/hardhat/devkit/ppc/8xx/powerpc-linux -> / > which is necessary on the _target_. Yes, we agree. We actually have already fixed this, but it missed the cutoff for the CDs; it was easy to fix, but was unfortunately overlooked until too late. It will be one of the first updates we post. > (Well, actually I'm not thrilled with the gcc/cccp.c relocation hack either; > this sounds like a job for configure --prefix to me, but aside from that I'm > happy :-) We have customers who want the installation location configurable at install time. gcc seems to be the only package that has a problem with this. I think we're working on a better solution for the next release. > Keep up the good work! Thanks -- Joe Green MontaVista Software, Inc. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/