From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mta11.charter.net (mta11.charter.net [216.33.127.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B9EDE1D3 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:03:41 +1100 (EST) Received: from aarprv04.charter.net ([10.20.200.74]) by mta11.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.03.00 201-2186-126-20070710) with ESMTP id <20080402180340.ZOFG5653.mta11.charter.net@aarprv04.charter.net> for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:03:40 -0400 Received: from DCOGLEYNEW ([71.93.35.174]) by aarprv04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20080402180339.ZXKS17353.aarprv04.charter.net@DCOGLEYNEW> for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:03:39 -0400 From: "Dave Cogley" To: References: Subject: RE: u-boot ppc440epx bootstrap configuration without eval board Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:03:37 -0700 Message-ID: <000901c894eb$e0707170$2001a8c0@DCOGLEYNEW> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C894B1.34119970" In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C894B1.34119970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Disregard the boot strapping problem. It appears we are hardwired strapped to use option "C" however my CPU is not being recognized as a 667MHz. Which option should I be using for the 667MHz processor? _____ From: Dave Cogley [mailto:dcogley@uslinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:15 AM To: 'linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org' Subject: u-boot ppc440epx bootstrap configuration without eval board Hello, We are using the new AMCC ppc440epx 667MHz chip and I am trying to get u-boot to recognize the clock rate of the new chip (we were using the 533MHz). I notice in the cmd_sequoia.c module that there is an option to setup some sort of strapping in the configuration FPGA that was present on the evaluation card. We do not have this configuration FPGA present in our production board. Is there some sort of build flag I can specify to "hardwire" this bootstrap information? Or at least some I can tell u-boot to startup with the 667MHz clock rate? I believe we are using option 7 in the configuration array for the "bootstrap" command. Thanks, Dave Cogley Software Engineer Ultra Stereo Labs, Inc. (805) 549-0161 mailto:dcogley@uslinc.com ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C894B1.34119970 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Disregard the boot strapping problem.  It appears we are hardwired strapped to use option = “C” however my CPU is not being recognized as a 667MHz.  Which option = should I be using for the 667MHz processor?

 

 

From: Dave = Cogley [mailto:dcogley@uslinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April = 02, 2008 10:15 AM
To: = 'linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org'
Subject: u-boot ppc440epx bootstrap configuration without eval board

 

Hello,

 

We are using the new AMCC ppc440epx 667MHz chip and I = am trying to get u-boot to recognize the clock rate of the new chip (we = were using the 533MHz).  I notice in the cmd_sequoia.c module that there is an = option to setup some sort of strapping in the configuration FPGA that was = present on the evaluation card.  We do not have this configuration FPGA = present in our production board.  Is there some sort of build flag I can = specify to “hardwire” this bootstrap information?  Or at least = some I can tell u-boot to startup with the 667MHz clock rate?  I believe we = are using option 7 in the configuration array for the “bootstrap” = command.

 

Thanks,

Dave Cogley

Software Engineer

Ultra Stereo Labs, Inc.

(805) 549-0161

mailto:dcogley@uslinc.com

 

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C894B1.34119970--