linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laurent Lagrange" <lagrange@fr.oleane.com>
To: "'Thiago Galesi'" <thiagogalesi@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: Linux kernel thread with Linux 2.6.x
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 11:46:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000a01c683cd$e3f29ca0$5201a8c0@GEG2400> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ecf08e0605291013t7bd1627bg92d13908b3d0b7b7@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Thanks for your answer, but a tasklet runs in interrupt context
(in_interrupt() != 0) so it doesn't support schedule() call
included in "down" semaphore function.

Any other idea ?

Laurent.

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Thiago Galesi [mailto:thiagogalesi@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : lun. 29 mai 2006 18:13
> À : Laurent Lagrange
> Cc : linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Objet : Re: Linux kernel thread with Linux 2.6.x
>
>
> >
> > As the interrupt handler can't be scheduled, I have made a
> kernel thread
> > which waits forever on a semaphore.
> > This semaphore is set when a received packet interrupt occured.
>
> You should look into tasklets for this. Not that your system is not
> OK, but, as you said it, it's not fast enough.
>
> Note that you still have some limitations using tasklets, but it's
> more flexible than Interrupt handlers.
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-30  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-11 16:31 NAND and JFFS2 supports in Linux 2.4 Laurent Lagrange
2006-04-11 20:06 ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2006-04-11 21:19 ` Josh Boyer
2006-04-13 14:49   ` Laurent Lagrange
2006-04-13 15:03     ` Jörn Engel
2006-05-29 15:35 ` Linux kernel thread with Linux 2.6.x Laurent Lagrange
2006-05-29 17:13   ` Thiago Galesi
2006-05-30  9:46     ` Laurent Lagrange [this message]
2006-05-30 11:23       ` Jörn Engel
2006-05-30 13:17         ` almoeli
2006-05-30 22:10   ` Andy Fleming
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-06 13:39 Laurent Lagrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000a01c683cd$e3f29ca0$5201a8c0@GEG2400' \
    --to=lagrange@fr.oleane.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=thiagogalesi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).