From: "Russell McGuire" <rmcguire@videopresence.com>
To: "'Kumar Gala'" <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: 8360E - PCI / DTC Blob Setup
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:49:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001001c74674$b17bf4f0$6405a8c0@absolut> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF782BFC-5262-462B-A522-8F685DC59158@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar,
THANK you, for pointing me in the right direction. I might have scratched my
head another 10 years finding this bug. And an apology for thinking I had a
software issue, when it was a hardware issue.
This is helping me greatly, all the while I had this sinking feeling, like I
didn't route any 'incoming' interrupt lines to the CPU. Something about the
8360 being able to get configured as an agent device, so I over looked the
use of the INTA pin on the CPU as incoming vs outgoing.
SO it would seem I didn't have ANY incoming pins, and thus the IRQ4-7 pins
that occur in the 8360E-MDS board were floating on my board. So as soon as
the sound driver enabled the interrupt, it was low all the time.
><HOST IRQ specifier> (on 83xx):>
>
>[linux,phandle for interrupt controller] [IRQ #] [sense]
I assume all these numbers are in HEX, So 0x14, 0x 15, 0x 16, 0x 17 would
correspond to external IRQ4-7 in the MPC8360E. I will wire this up and give
it a shot, guess it works better when they are connected.
><PCI DEV specifier>:
>
>[(bus << 16) | (idsel << 11)] 0 0
Well I think this is definitely part of my problem.
So I am mapping interrupts from bus 1 and 2, I would need something like?
Alternating the 14,15,16,17 to make a 'load-balanced' mapping? Are the bus
> Bus 1, Slot 1, IDSEL = AD20
1a000 0 0 1 700 14 8
1a000 0 0 1 700 15 8
1a000 0 0 1 700 16 8
1a000 0 0 1 700 17 8
> Bus 1, Slot 2, IDSEL = AD24
1c000 0 0 1 700 15 8
1c000 0 0 1 700 16 8
1c000 0 0 1 700 17 8
1c000 0 0 1 700 18 8
> Bus 2, Slot 1, IDSEL = AD20
2a000 0 0 1 700 16 8
2a000 0 0 1 700 17 8
2a000 0 0 1 700 18 8
2a000 0 0 1 700 19 8
-Russ
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:11 AM
To: rmcguire@videopresence.com
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: 8360E - PCI / DTC Blob Setup
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Russell McGuire wrote:
> This might be the wrong forum to discuss HW routing, but I am not
> sure of
> many HW guys that would understand blob setups. I know I still don't.
>
> I read through the booting-without-of-tree.txt and it doesn't
> explain this
> other than the interrupt routing needs to be present. Perhaps some
> of the
> maintainers of the 83xx platforms can explain how this blob is
> developed?
> I assume their board work with the submitted mp38360emds.dts files,
> as an
> example.
>
> Let me see if I can simplify this, I had this schematic reviewed by
> Pericom
> <a PCI bridge MFG> and they recommended these IDSEL lines. And I
> know the
> card detection works great, in U-boot.
>
> My external PCI bridge is the only thing routed directly to the
> 8360 Host
> bridge. The PCI Host bridge in my system is connected on IDSEL-
> >AD25,0x19
> Perhaps I shouldn't use any interrupt routing for this, as there is
> no true
> /INTA line tied directly to the bridge?
>
> My Three PCI slots are routed as follows:
>
> Bus 0, Bridge Chip, IDSEL = AD25
Huh, this is only describes one slot/connection. If you have 3
slots, they'd have 3 unique IDSELs
> Other side of the Host bridge, all are routed to INTA directly to the
> CPU.
> Bus 1, Slot 1, IDSEL = AD20 <card would be ID'd as 1.04 (Bus.Dev)>
> Bus 1, Slot 2, IDSEL = AD24 <card would be ID'd as 1.08 (Bus.Dev)>
> Bus 2, Slot 1, IDSEL = AD20 <card would be ID'd as 2.04 (Bus.Dev)>
>
> That being said:
> /* IDSEL 0x19 AD25*/
> c800 0 0 1 700 14 8
so the way you read this:
<PCI DEV specifier> <INT A-D> <HOST IRQ specifier>
Do break it down further:
<PCI DEV specifier>:
[(bus << 16) | (idsel << 11)] 0 0
<INT A-D>:
INTA - 1
INTB - 2
INTC - 3
INTD - 4
<HOST IRQ specifier> (on 83xx):
[linux,phandle for interrupt controller] [IRQ #] [sense]
> I see in the c800 directly corresponds to the 83xx manual for PCI
> CONFIG
> address mapping for AD25.
>
> I think the '1' is mapped to /INTA, which is the only PCI INT
> available in
> the 8360E.
INTA..INTD is more about the device, not host.
> I understand the 700 in this case is the address of the PIC@700.
>
> That leaves 5 fields/questions.
> 1) What do the first two '0's after c800 mean?
There always 0 0, since the int masks them away (they normally
describe the address the device is at)
> 2) What does the '14' map to?
0x14 is the external IRQ # its wired to.
> 3) What does the '8' map to?
Sense of IRQ, should always be level for PCI.
> 4) Why would some boards map multiple interrupts to a single IDSEL,
> like the
> mpc8360emds.dts file? Is this to handle extra bridges that might be
> plugged
> in at a later time?
This is to handle the fact that a PCI add on card put into a slot
might use multiple interrupts (INTA, INTB), so it lists multiple
entries to cover the 4 PCI defined interrupts.
> If I understand the mapping correctly then I think I can hard code
> in the
> interrupts for the PCI slots.
>
> So I don't drive everybody nuts, is there actual documentation on
> this. I
> would be happy to stop spamming this list... :-)
There is, but its scattered in places.
Its good to ask these questions so the answers will get archived and
other people can figure it out as well.
- k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-02 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1454.1170226011.9285.linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
2007-01-31 12:14 ` Audigy SE / ca0106 driver for PowerPC? Russell McGuire
2007-01-31 14:52 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31 15:20 ` Russell McGuire
2007-01-31 15:34 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31 21:00 ` Russell McGuire
2007-01-31 21:55 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31 22:27 ` Russell McGuire
2007-01-31 22:40 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31 23:01 ` Russell McGuire
2007-01-31 23:19 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31 23:42 ` Russell McGuire
2007-01-31 23:49 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-01 14:27 ` 8360E - PCI / DTC Blob Setup Russell McGuire
2007-02-01 14:33 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-01 17:48 ` Russell McGuire
2007-02-01 18:11 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-02 2:49 ` Russell McGuire [this message]
2007-02-02 6:20 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-02 13:36 ` Russell McGuire
2007-02-02 15:48 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-03 5:32 ` Russell McGuire
2007-02-05 1:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-08 3:07 ` Andy Fleming
[not found] ` <000501c74592$2229e060$6405a8c0@absolut>
[not found] ` <53119C53-A3A7-4808-849A-09226BBEAC3B@kernel.crashing.org>
2007-02-01 9:00 ` Audigy SE / ca0106 driver for PowerPC? Russell McGuire
2007-02-01 14:22 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001001c74674$b17bf4f0$6405a8c0@absolut' \
--to=rmcguire@videopresence.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).