From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Franz Sirl Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:25:49 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: Linux/PPC Development , Linux/m68k To: Geert Uytterhoeven References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Mac/m68k patches? MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00121212254900.01193@enzo.bigblue.local> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tuesday 12 December 2000 12:05, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Franz Sirl wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 December 2000 10:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > I have these Mac/m68k patches in my patchqueue which affect PowerMac as > > > well. Anyone who has a problem with them, or can I send them to Linus? > > > > > > diff -urN linux-2.4.0-test12/drivers/input/keybdev.c > > > linux-m68k-2.4.0-test12/drivers/input/keybdev.c --- > > > linux-2.4.0-test12/drivers/input/keybdev.c Fri Jul 28 03:36:54 2000 +++ > > > linux-m68k-2.4.0-test12/drivers/input/keybdev.c Tue Dec 12 09:02:47 > > > 2000 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > -#elif defined(CONFIG_ADB_KEYBOARD) > > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_INPUT_ADBHID) > > > > > > static unsigned char mac_keycodes[128] = > > > { 0, 53, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 22, 26, 28, 25, 29, 27, 24, 51, 48, > > > > This one is wrong, the right patch is in bk_2_3 and has been feeded to > > Linus already, see my post on l-k last week. You can however trigger > > Linus again to finally apply it :-). The patch to adbhid.c is fine with > > me. > > You can increase your chances slightly by not sending the patch as an > attachment, but by plainly including it in your mail. Really? It's a 8-bit text/plain attachment and mutt displays it fine inline. Saving the message saves it in one file and patch happily uses it as input. Well, I can resend anyway I believe... Franz. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/