From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <Joakim.Tjernlund@lumentis.se>
To: "Eugene Surovegin" <ebs@innocent.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC?
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:35:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001901c2a21d$f3f4e760$0200a8c0@jockeXP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5.1.0.14.2.20021212102609.02d48730@pop.prodigy.net
Was that the 2.4.19-2 patch? What were the bugs and have you fixed them?
According to the message Robert posted on lkm is the 2.4.20-1 patch only a
rediff of the latest 2.4.19 patch.
BTW, I am on the 2_4_devel branch.
Jocke
> At 04:56 AM 12/12/2002, you wrote:
> >I am testing the latest(2.4.20-1) preemtive kernel patch from Robert Love and
> >I wonder if anybody know if it's unsafe/not working for 8xx or PPC in general?
>
> I haven't tested patch for 2.4.20 but patch for 2.4.19 contained some bugs.
>
>
> Eugene Surovegin <mailto:ebs@innocent.com>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-12 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 13:18 Regarding consistent_alloc Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 13:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 14:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 15:59 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 16:08 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:30 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 18:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:52 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:59 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-06 22:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 0:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-07 12:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 16:53 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-09 9:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-10 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 3:52 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 8:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-11 9:58 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 15:01 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 15:36 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 3:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-11 14:56 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 15:07 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 3:41 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-12 8:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 8:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-12-12 8:37 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 12:56 ` Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC? Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-12 18:28 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-12 20:35 ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
2002-12-13 4:12 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 6:09 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-13 7:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-16 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 4:08 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 16:53 ` "Missing" patches (Was: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc) Tom Rini
2002-12-06 16:56 ` Regarding consistent_alloc Dan Malek
2002-12-06 18:29 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:45 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-07 0:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-06 15:54 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001901c2a21d$f3f4e760$0200a8c0@jockeXP' \
--to=joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se \
--cc=ebs@innocent.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).