From: "AlessandroPPC" <aleppcrossi@libero.it>
To: "Wolfgang Denk" <wd@denx.de>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: R: ram root filesystem
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:36:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001c01c3bb0a$e18eb900$0400a8c0@eurostudio.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031203181613.75859C5F5F@atlas.denx.de
Many Thanks Wolfgang Denk for your indacations.
Something abaut your questions.
> Question 1: why don't you use the much simpler and smaller setup
> based on the SELF ramdisk example image included with the ELDK?
> Please see http://www.denx.de/twiki/bin/view/DULG/HowToAddFiles
My application now is running and it is stable with nfs-ELDK package, and I
want pass
to ram fs to do a more efficiently embedded system with the minimum
difference respect
to nfs because I don't want to lose the stability.
> Question 2: Why don't you simply use the genext2fs tool that comes
> included with the ELDK? It is much simpler, and requires no root
> permissions to create a ramdisk image.
>
Yes I will try the genext2fs tool .
> The "rc.sysint" was never meant to be used from a ramdisk based root
> filesystem. If you change your configuration, you are expected to
> adapt all related config files and init scripts, too.
Ok I 'm just adapting my config files and init scripts.
>
> It makes no sense to run fsck on a ramdisk image which was just
> unpacked. Also, IMHO it makes littlee sense to use the full-blown
> SysV init style scripts in an embedded system which is running from a
> ramdisk image.
>
Yes I agree, but the question is : why a tool thought to check fs don't work
on my fs image? Where is the mistake?
Sorry, but what do yo mean with IMHO ?
> Have a look at the ELF image thatis included with the ELDK, and use
> this as a base.
>
I'm investigating abaut your ELF image...
Thanks again,
Regards,
Alessandro
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-03 17:48 ram root filesystem AlessandroPPC
2003-12-03 18:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-12-04 10:12 ` Use of several CFI flash chips physically mapped in memory Gérard Guével
2003-12-05 8:36 ` AlessandroPPC [this message]
2003-12-04 0:08 ` problem using both mpc857dsl fec and scc1 Dennis Khoo
2003-12-05 11:11 ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2003-12-05 18:53 ` Dennis Khoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001c01c3bb0a$e18eb900$0400a8c0@eurostudio.local' \
--to=aleppcrossi@libero.it \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).