linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "AlessandroPPC" <aleppcrossi@libero.it>
To: "Wolfgang Denk" <wd@denx.de>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: R: ram root filesystem
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:36:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001c01c3bb0a$e18eb900$0400a8c0@eurostudio.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031203181613.75859C5F5F@atlas.denx.de


Many Thanks Wolfgang Denk for your indacations.
Something abaut your questions.

> Question 1: why don't you use the  much  simpler  and  smaller  setup
> based  on  the  SELF  ramdisk  example  image included with the ELDK?
> Please see http://www.denx.de/twiki/bin/view/DULG/HowToAddFiles

My application now is running and it is stable with nfs-ELDK package, and I
want pass
to ram fs to do a more efficiently embedded system with the minimum
difference respect
 to nfs because I don't want to lose the stability.

> Question 2: Why don't you simply use the genext2fs  tool  that  comes
> included  with  the  ELDK?  It  is much simpler, and requires no root
> permissions to create a ramdisk image.
>

Yes I will try the genext2fs  tool .

> The "rc.sysint" was never meant to be used from a ramdisk based  root
> filesystem.  If  you  change  your configuration, you are expected to
> adapt all related config files and init scripts, too.

Ok I 'm just adapting my config files and init scripts.


>
> It makes no sense to run fsck on  a  ramdisk  image  which  was  just
> unpacked.  Also,  IMHO  it  makes littlee sense to use the full-blown
> SysV init style scripts in an embedded system which is running from a
> ramdisk image.
>
Yes I agree, but the question is : why a tool thought to check fs don't work
on my fs image? Where is the mistake?
Sorry, but what do yo mean with IMHO ?

> Have a look at the ELF image thatis included with the ELDK,  and  use
> this as a base.
>
I'm investigating abaut your ELF image...

Thanks again,
Regards,
Alessandro


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-05  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-03 17:48 ram root filesystem AlessandroPPC
2003-12-03 18:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-12-04 10:12   ` Use of several CFI flash chips physically mapped in memory Gérard Guével
2003-12-05  8:36   ` AlessandroPPC [this message]
2003-12-04  0:08 ` problem using both mpc857dsl fec and scc1 Dennis Khoo
2003-12-05 11:11   ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2003-12-05 18:53     ` Dennis Khoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001c01c3bb0a$e18eb900$0400a8c0@eurostudio.local' \
    --to=aleppcrossi@libero.it \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=wd@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).