From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se>
To: "Linuxppc-Embedded@Lists. Linuxppc. Org (E-mail)"
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: NAPI & 8xx/82xx enet.c driver?
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:35:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002301c3b818$51c00350$0a01a8c0@LUMENTIS02> (raw)
Hi all
I wounder if anyone has done some measurement on 8xx/82xx
current driver v.s a NAPI(New API) converted driver and willing
to share the resluts?
NAPI(see Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt) is supposed to reduce #irqs
under high load, which will increase small packet throughput. It got backported
to 2.4(around 2.4.20)
Jocke
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
reply other threads:[~2003-12-01 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002301c3b818$51c00350$0a01a8c0@LUMENTIS02' \
--to=joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).