From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nm.naver.com (i61972.naver.com [211.218.150.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E37DDEE8 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:18:33 +1000 (EST) From: "seokin Hong" To: "'Josh Boyer'" References: <001301c91e90$7e0090e0$7a01b2a0$@com> <20080925001323.GA26152@yoda.jdub.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20080925001323.GA26152@yoda.jdub.homelinux.org> Subject: RE: Tickless and CPU Idle framework for PPC405 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:17:54 +0900 Message-ID: <002a01c91ede$d3fdd310$7bf97930$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Generic processor idle management framework http://ols.108.redhat.com/2007/Reprints/pallipadi-Reprint.pdf The interface and machine independent interface is in following directory.. /drivers/cpuidle So, I wonder that the linux kernel ported for PPC405 use this framework to save power. And Is the tickless feature is added to that kernel? -----Original Message----- From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+nagne_hsi=naver.com@ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+nagne_hsi=naver.com@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:13 AM To: seokin Hong Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Tickless and CPU Idle framework for PPC405 On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 06:57:09AM +0900, seokin Hong wrote: >Hi, All > > > >Is the tickless feature and CPU Idle framework is added in linux tree for >PPC405? What CPU Idle framework? josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded