From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <003001bf5b47$6aeebe20$73f102de@sjzhu>
Reply-To: "Shuangjun Zhu (r44089)" <r44089@email.sps.mot.com>
From: "Shuangjun Zhu" <r44089@email.sps.mot.com>
To: "LiuTao" <tliu@ict.ac.cn>,
        "LinuxPPC Developers List" <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
        <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: ~{;X84~}: problem with gunzip()
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:48:05 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="hz-gb-2312"
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Before you gunzip the kernel, clear the interrupt bit in the
machine status register.

-----Original Message-----
From: LiuTao <tliu@ict.ac.cn>
To: LinuxPPC Developers List <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>; linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Date: Monday, January 10, 2000 4:43 PM
Subject: problem with gunzip()


>
>Hi
>
>When I ported linux to a board with MPC860, 16M RAM and 2M Flash,
>I met a problem.
>After the program gunzip()(misc.c) the vmlinux image to address 0x0,
>the contents from 0x0 to IMAGE_SIZE should be as same as that in
>linux/vmlinux, right? I found that they are not same. Only from 0x0
>to about 0xb500, they are same.
>I don't think gunzip() has any problem.
>Do you have any suggestions?
>Thanks!
>
>LiuTao
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/