From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <003301c34473$0f88d7a0$020120b0@jockeXP>
From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <Joakim.Tjernlund@lumentis.se>
To: "J?rn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: "Linuxppc-Dev@Lists. Linuxppc. Org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
References: <16133.19178.764449.966821@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <IGEFJKJNHJDCBKALBJLLOEPGFNAA.joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se> <16134.4102.899233.25492@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20030705072119.GA32363@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <16134.52251.943207.814024@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20030705170145.GA29928@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Subject: Re: memmove broken
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 12:32:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


> > You are proposing to replace simple, working code with considerably
> > more complex code.  You need to be able to point to a specific real
> > situation where your change makes a significant difference if you want
> > to get it accepted.
>
> Agreed.  And even then, I don't want to submit it before 2.7.

Why? Just look at 2.4 and you will find much boulder stuff going
in there than this.

  Jocke

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/