From: "Navin Boppuri" <nboppuri@trinetcommunication.com>
To: "Leonard Ye" <leonardye@xoommail.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: is (F)ADS 8xx board mature enough?
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:33:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003d01bfc6ee$995bce70$4a1f76d8@washington> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200101260218.SAA28758@xoommail.com
Hello Leonard,
I have used the FADS 823 for my needs. I did not have any major problems
with it. But the pro's tell me that it is not a reliable board.
I have also used the TQM823 board from Denx. It is a reliable board and the
support is good. My reason for getting the TQM823 board was that I could use
2 RS-232's. The FADS 823 has a 2nd RS-232 which may be used only if the
ethernet is turned off.
Hope this helps.
Navin Boppuri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leonard Ye" <leonardye@xoommail.com>
To: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:18 AM
Subject: is (F)ADS 8xx board mature enough?
> A newbie question. Currently, I am considering using FADS 823/850/860
> board for embedded system development. While I was reading the "Linux for
> PowerPC Embedded Systems HOWTO" as every newbie did initially, I was
> referred to the message written by Dan Malek on 03 Sep 1999 in this
> maillist. His oppinion on FADS 8xx is that "I don't recommend using any
> (F)ADS board with Linux/PPC." The full message can be viewed at:
> http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-embedded/199909/msg00007.html
>
> It has been more than one year since this message was written. I would like
> to know has this situation been changed? I need good PCMCIA, ethernet and
> UART support, USB support is need in the second stage of development. Any
> comments from you guys?
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-26 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-26 2:18 is (F)ADS 8xx board mature enough? Leonard Ye
2001-01-26 7:21 ` Remote multi-thread debugging is valid? Kwanksuk Kim
2001-01-26 15:33 ` Navin Boppuri [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003d01bfc6ee$995bce70$4a1f76d8@washington' \
--to=nboppuri@trinetcommunication.com \
--cc=leonardye@xoommail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).