From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/9] (arm|powerpc|s390x): Makefile: Fix .aux.o generation
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:28:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003f43ab-cce9-408d-8354-b7884f513ad1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202-2f93f59553cec386791f7629@orel>
On 02/02/2024 10.30, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 04:57:32PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Using all prerequisites for the source file results in the build
>> dying on the second time around with:
>>
>> gcc: fatal error: cannot specify ‘-o’ with ‘-c’, ‘-S’ or ‘-E’ with multiple files
>>
>> This is due to auxinfo.h becoming a prerequisite after the first
>> build recorded the dependency.
D'oh, of course I only tried to run "make" once when testing that patch :-/
>> diff --git a/arm/Makefile.common b/arm/Makefile.common
>> index 54cb4a63..c2ee568c 100644
>> --- a/arm/Makefile.common
>> +++ b/arm/Makefile.common
>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ FLATLIBS = $(libcflat) $(LIBFDT_archive) $(libeabi)
>>
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_EFI),y)
>> %.aux.o: $(SRCDIR)/lib/auxinfo.c
>> - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $^ \
>> + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< \
>> -DPROGNAME=\"$(@:.aux.o=.efi)\" -DAUXFLAGS=$(AUXFLAGS)
>
> There are two instances of the %.aux.o target in arm/Makefile.common. We
> need to fix both. We can actually pull the target out of the two arms of
> the CONFIG_EFI if-else, though, by changing the .efi/.flat to .$(exe).
I went ahead and pushed this patch with the trivial fix for the else-branch
to the repo to unbreak the build. If you think it's worthwhile to unify the
target, please provide a patch to do so, thanks!
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 6:57 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/9] Multi-migration support Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/9] (arm|powerpc|s390x): Makefile: Fix .aux.o generation Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 9:30 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-05 11:28 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2024-02-05 14:20 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] arch-run: Clean up temporary files properly Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-07 7:58 ` Thomas Huth
2024-02-09 5:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] arch-run: Clean up initrd cleanup Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-05 12:04 ` Thomas Huth
2024-02-06 5:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] migration: use a more robust way to wait for background job Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-05 14:58 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-02-06 6:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] migration: Support multiple migrations Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arch-run: rename migration variables Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/9] migration: Add quiet migration support Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/9] Add common/ directory for architecture-independent tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-02 6:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 9/9] migration: add a migration selftest Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=003f43ab-cce9-408d-8354-b7884f513ad1@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).