From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.165]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD2367BC2 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:14:39 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <004001c57e47$5cae9410$0301a8c0@chuck2> From: "Mark Chambers" To: "Dan Malek" , "Clemens Koller" References: <42C40BD0.8040408@anagramm.de><658739DB-540F-4AFC-80DC-BBF0C2AD70F4@freescale.com><42C4162E.4030602@anagramm.de><427c70958bb995dad4fbad2e6ff121bc@embeddededge.com><42C4F50D.3050405@anagramm.de> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:15:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: MPC85xx DMA support for Kernel 2.6? List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > On Jul 1, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Clemens Koller wrote: > > > .... And currently, when I access (memcopy) the SRAM on my > > Local Bus via UPM I cannot get it to generate bursts yet, so I hope the > > DMA will speed up those things, too. > > If the CPU won't do it, the DMA won't either. You better get that > UPM working first :-) > > > -- Dan > Is the SRAM being cached? I don't think the CPU will generate bursts unless it's cached, right? Mark Chambers