From: "Mark Chambers" <markc@mail.com>
To: "Adisorn Ermongkonchai" <aermongk@yahoo.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Poor 8260 FCC Ethernet performance
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:51:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004501c44c8e$25a824e0$0301a8c0@chuck2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040606180042.47373.qmail@web50501.mail.yahoo.com
Hi Adisorn,
You should probably try monitoring your network with Ethereal or something
similar to see what the problem really is - in other words make sure that
the problem really is packets coming out of your board too slowly.
Mark Chambers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adisorn Ermongkonchai" <aermongk@yahoo.com>
To: <acurtis@onz.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 2:00 PM
Subject: Poor 8260 FCC Ethernet performance
>
> Hi Allen and Linuxppc-embedded guru,
>
> Referring to your 31 May 2002 post to LinuxPPC about
> poor 8260 FCC Ether performance. Did you figure
> out why is the FCC so slow? We have encountered this
> problem as well. We use the newer MPC8270 with 400MHz
> clock and 200MHz CPM speed with BCM5222 PHY. It
> ended up running at only ~5Mbps on 100Mbps Ethernet
> line. We just tried 1 FCC.
>
> Does anyone on this post see the same problem? We use
> linux 2.4.18 with PPC pqii driver (somehow the other
> driver didn't seem to work for all 3 FCC's) We
> also tried on Motorola 8260 eval board and the result
> is the same. We also tried MEN Micro F6, it gave
> better result from 11MBps to 30Mbps. We also tried
> just uboot to eliminate Linux out of the picture and
> the result was about the same.
>
> I was about to give up on this MPC8270 then I saw this
> post so I thought I try. I cannot believe that
> Motorola would make a chip that support 3 FCC's
> but can only run at this ridiculous speed. I am
> software engineer, this could be hardware.
>
> Can anyone help me on this? I'm about to have to
> change the processor to PowerPC 4xx.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Adisorn Ermongkonchai
>
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-07 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-06 18:00 Poor 8260 FCC Ethernet performance Adisorn Ermongkonchai
2004-06-07 12:51 ` Mark Chambers [this message]
2004-06-07 17:21 ` Adisorn Ermongkonchai
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-10 19:26 Rune Torgersen
2004-06-09 22:33 Rune Torgersen
2004-06-10 17:56 ` Dan Malek
2004-06-09 22:19 Rune Torgersen
2004-06-09 22:27 ` Gary Thomas
2004-06-07 17:33 VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE)
2004-06-08 6:29 ` Wojciech Kromer
2004-06-07 12:32 Dayton, Dean
2004-06-07 12:14 Dayton, Dean
2004-06-07 12:16 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-05-31 3:25 Jean-Denis Boyer
2002-05-31 3:42 ` Allen Curtis
2002-05-31 15:51 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-01 3:09 ` Allen Curtis
2002-05-31 3:07 Allen Curtis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004501c44c8e$25a824e0$0301a8c0@chuck2' \
--to=markc@mail.com \
--cc=aermongk@yahoo.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).