From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <005501c34487$7bcafc40$020120b0@jockeXP> From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: "J?rn Engel" Cc: "Paul Mackerras" , "Linuxppc-Dev@Lists. Linuxppc. Org" References: <16133.19178.764449.966821@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <16134.4102.899233.25492@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20030705072119.GA32363@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <16134.52251.943207.814024@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20030705170145.GA29928@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <003301c34473$0f88d7a0$020120b0@jockeXP> <20030707120606.GC7104@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Subject: Re: memmove broken Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:58:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > On Mon, 7 July 2003 12:32:21 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > Agreed. And even then, I don't want to submit it before 2.7. > > > > Why? Just look at 2.4 and you will find much boulder stuff going > > in there than this. > > Other people's bad example is no justification for my misbehaviour. ;) > > This patch doesn't fix anything that is wrong, and it doesn't add > functionality that isn't there right now. [SNIP] Nor does most of you zlib patches either, but most of them are in 2.5. Point being, this is not a major change(so far). If nothing wrong is found and it is noticeably faster, I think it should go into 2.5. Jocke ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/