From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <markc@mail.com>
Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net
	[66.133.131.37]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684822BC0F
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:48:43 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <005601c4b155$8ae3fbf0$0301a8c0@chuck2>
From: "Mark Chambers" <markc@mail.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
	"Embedded PPC Linux list" <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410131423540.12426@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: 
Subject: Re: "I2C" versus "IIC"
List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List
	<linuxppc-embedded.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: "Embedded PPC Linux list" <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:26 PM
Subject: "I2C" versus "IIC"

My vote, since nobody asked, would be "I2C".  I've always heard people
say "I squared C", and since only CBS can get superscripts out of ASCII
I2C is about as close as you can get.  I2C is more unique and hence
a more readily recognizable acronym.

But I'm sure we could get about 50/50 voting on this.

Mark