From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <007a01c38869$c2287200$020120b0@jockeXP>
From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <Joakim.Tjernlund@lumentis.se>
To: "Tom Rini" <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Kumar Gala" <kumar.gala@motorola.com>,
	"linuxppc embedded" <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
References: <3F79A106.8010608@embeddededge.com> <3F417AA6-F41B-11D7-B134-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com> <20031001143243.GE12343@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <1065019736.9737.526.camel@hermes> <005801c38861$e7a596a0$020120b0@jockeXP> <20031001213239.GA17768@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <006001c38866$3017e560$020120b0@jockeXP> <20031001220048.GB17768@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net>
Subject: Re: Problem of concurrency in arch/ppc/8260_io/uart.c
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 00:17:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


> > > It's in the linuxppc-2.4 tree.  I'll try and get it to Marcelo in time
> > > for 2.4.21-pre7.
> >
> > Ahh, found it in http://ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc-2.4. I did look in
> > http://ppc.bitkeeper.com:8080/linuxppc_2_4 but it is not there. Is this tree obsolete?
>
> It's not preferred, certainly.

What about linuxppc_2_4_devel? Is that also "non preferred"?

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/