From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tmnt04.transmode.se (147.175.241.83.in-addr.dgcsystems.net [83.241.175.147]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8674DDDFE for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:19:57 +1100 (EST) From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: "'Kumar Gala'" Subject: RE: latest linux git doesn't compile ucc_geth_phy.c and ucc_geth.c Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:19:47 +0100 Message-ID: <00a601c730cc$2c3aef70$1e67a8c0@Jocke> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <27EF3DDC-DD21-4EAA-A3F2-36FD21BA1696@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: 'linuxppc-dev' List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > -----Original Message----- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] > Sent: den 18 december 2006 19:44 > To: Timur Tabi > Cc: Joakim Tjernlund; 'linuxppc-dev' > Subject: Re: latest linux git doesn't compile ucc_geth_phy.c > and ucc_geth.c > > > On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > >>> I've tested these on an 8360EMDS, and Kumar has reviewed and > >>> signed off on the > >>> code, so I think they're good. Please let me know if they're not. > >> > >> Has these been sent upstream yet? Didn't se them in linux tree as > >> of now. > > > > I posted the patches to the linuxppc-dev and netdev mailing > lists. > > At this > > point, these patches are at the whim of Paul M. and/or Jeff G. for > > merging. > > Since the holidays are upon us, I'm not surprised that things are > > taking longer > > than normal. > > There really at the whim of Jeff G. since they are completely driver > related. I pinged Jeff G. to hopefully pick them up and push them > for 2.6.20. I do think these has been forgotten. Jocke