linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark Chambers" <markc@mail.com>
To: "Linuxppc-Embedded \(\(E-Mail\)\)" <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Memory mapping PCI memory region to user space
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:43:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00be01c64ea1$4c6e0e20$6401a8c0@CHUCK2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CCA437BF-E204-4652-9E6D-25388225EFE8@kernel.crashing.org

>>
>> When I was testing the Yosemite board as the host, I found
>> that I could set the endian flag on the mmapped page, which
>> then made the PCI device registers read as 32-bit quantities
>> read back with the same layout under both x86 and PPC
>> hosts.
>
> Hmm, I guess I would handle this like how the reset of the kernel
> handle is with the io routines handling the swapping.  Not sure if
> there is any advantage to using the endian flag.  I guess if you have
> something you are treating as just memory there would be.
>
>> So, if someone planned on using that 'feature', that would
>> be a reason for writing your own mmap() implementation.
>> I didn't see any option in the sysfs file for setting that
>> page flag (but, I didn't look around in other sysfs files).
>
> There isn't a sysfs flag for the endianness page attribute since
> thats a PPC book-e specific feature.  We could possible expand things
> to support it but, I've been trying to actively avoid using the 'E' bit.
>

Framebuffer applications could care about this.  Also, on the MPC8247
(maybe others, but I know about this one) you can make the PCI space
big- or little-endian.

Seems to me this is really not an endian issue but a PCI implementation
issue.  PCI is actually endian-agnostic, so we're really 'fixing' the 
Freescale
PCI implementation with endian swapping.

Mark Chambers 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-23 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-23 14:21 Memory mapping PCI memory region to user space Wyse, Chris
2006-03-23 15:44 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-23 17:12   ` David Hawkins
2006-03-23 17:19     ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-23 17:43       ` Mark Chambers [this message]
2006-03-23 17:54         ` David Hawkins
2006-03-23 19:55           ` Mark Chambers
2006-03-23 20:26             ` David Hawkins
2006-03-23 17:46       ` David Hawkins
2006-03-27  8:02   ` Phil Nitschke
2006-03-27 16:05     ` David Hawkins
2006-03-28  4:21       ` Phil Nitschke
2006-03-28  4:55         ` David Hawkins
2006-03-28  6:44           ` Phil Nitschke
2006-03-28 16:35             ` David Hawkins
2006-03-27 16:18     ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-29  2:26       ` Phil Nitschke
2006-03-23 17:04 ` David Hawkins
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-23 19:52 Wyse, Chris
2006-03-23 20:01 ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00be01c64ea1$4c6e0e20$6401a8c0@CHUCK2' \
    --to=markc@mail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).