From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C973BDDE35 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:05:27 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <32F3CC26D4DAC44E8ECD07155727A46E816A6B@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net> References: <32F3CC26D4DAC44E8ECD07155727A46E816A6B@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <00d809d44c8e8286fd4bf9de16ee6b10@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:06:04 +0100 To: "Zhu Ebony-r57400" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I wrote some cases for testing. For SPFP and DPFP exception testing, > the test cases included plus, minus, multiply, divide, comparisons, > conversions, > DBZ... for Nan/Denorm/Inf numbers. I also tested the cases that > the operation result would generate Nan/Denorm/Inf/overflow/underflow > numbers. For Vector SPFP exception testing, I wrote inline asm based > testing > program to test the instructions directly. Any chance you could submit that testing code too? Would be useful for others :-) Segher