[PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()

[PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()

[Roel Kluin]

mpc83xx_spi->irq is unsigned, so the test fails

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
---
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
index be15a62..033fd51 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
@@ -454,12 +454,12 @@ static int __init mpc83xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 		goto put_master;
 	}
 
-	mpc83xx_spi->irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
-
-	if (mpc83xx_spi->irq < 0) {
-		ret = -ENXIO;
+	ret = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto unmap_io;
-	}
+
+	mpc83xx_spi->irq = ret;
+	ret = 0;
 
 	/* Register for SPI Interrupt */
 	ret = request_irq(mpc83xx_spi->irq, mpc83xx_spi_irq,

RE: [PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()

[Joakim Tjernlund]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se@ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc-dev-
> bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Roel Kluin
> Sent: den 23 april 2008 22:55
> To: galak@kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net; dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net; lkml
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()
> 
> mpc83xx_spi->irq is unsigned, so the test fails
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>

hmm, I got a pretty large 83xx spi patch queued at dbrownell. I hope
that one can be applied first. Then you probably need to rediff this patch.

David, any progress on my patch?

 Jocke
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> index be15a62..033fd51 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> @@ -454,12 +454,12 @@ static int __init mpc83xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>  		goto put_master;
>  	}
> 
> -	mpc83xx_spi->irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> -
> -	if (mpc83xx_spi->irq < 0) {
> -		ret = -ENXIO;
> +	ret = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto unmap_io;
> -	}
> +
> +	mpc83xx_spi->irq = ret;
> +	ret = 0;
> 
>  	/* Register for SPI Interrupt */
>  	ret = request_irq(mpc83xx_spi->irq, mpc83xx_spi_irq,
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 

RE: [PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()

[Joakim Tjernlund]

On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 23:55 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se@ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc-dev-
> > bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Roel Kluin
> > Sent: den 23 april 2008 22:55
> > To: galak@kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net; dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net; lkml
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()
> > 
> > mpc83xx_spi->irq is unsigned, so the test fails
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> 
> hmm, I got a pretty large 83xx spi patch queued at dbrownell. I hope
> that one can be applied first. Then you probably need to rediff this patch.
> 
> David, any progress on my patch?

David, heard nothing from you in a while. Don't you get my mails?

   Jocke 

> 
>  Jocke
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> > index be15a62..033fd51 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> > @@ -454,12 +454,12 @@ static int __init mpc83xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> >  		goto put_master;
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	mpc83xx_spi->irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> > -
> > -	if (mpc83xx_spi->irq < 0) {
> > -		ret = -ENXIO;
> > +	ret = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> >  		goto unmap_io;
> > -	}
> > +
> > +	mpc83xx_spi->irq = ret;
> > +	ret = 0;
> > 
> >  	/* Register for SPI Interrupt */
> >  	ret = request_irq(mpc83xx_spi->irq, mpc83xx_spi_irq,
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi_mpc83xx: test below 0 on unsigned irq in mpc83xx_spi_probe()

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:55:16 +0200
Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> wrote:

> mpc83xx_spi->irq is unsigned, so the test fails
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> index be15a62..033fd51 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> @@ -454,12 +454,12 @@ static int __init mpc83xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>  		goto put_master;
>  	}
>  
> -	mpc83xx_spi->irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> -
> -	if (mpc83xx_spi->irq < 0) {
> -		ret = -ENXIO;
> +	ret = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto unmap_io;
> -	}
> +
> +	mpc83xx_spi->irq = ret;
> +	ret = 0;
>  
>  	/* Register for SPI Interrupt */
>  	ret = request_irq(mpc83xx_spi->irq, mpc83xx_spi_irq,
> 

In the recently-merged spi_mpc83xx-much-improved-driver.patch, mpc83xx_spi.irq
has type `int' so I don't think we need this fix any more.