linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>
To: Jeffrey Hawkins <Jeffrey.F.Hawkins@motorola.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: do md5sums differ across architectures?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:13:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01022216133800.04317@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A9571F2.4751730C@motorola.com>


Hi,

Here is what md5sum --version says on my machine.

[kbhend@localhost kbhend]$ md5sum --version
md5sum (GNU textutils) 2.0e
Written by Ulrich Drepper.

Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[kbhend@localhost kbhend]$


This appears to be newer that yours.  I will upgrade textutils again on both
my box and the solaris 7 box.  Hopefully eventually they will coincide.

I still don't know why MacOSX differs from both.  I thought it would match
one or the other so that I knew which one to upgrade.

Thanks,

Kevin


On Thursday 22 February 2001 15:09, Jeffrey Hawkins wrote:
> Kevin,
>
>
> Don't know what is going on with your md5sum, but
> I ran it on a LinuxPPC 2.2.17 System and a SunOS 5.6,
> and got the same results ??????  The version of md5sum
> on Linux was 1.22, and the version on Sun was 2.0.
>
>
> Jeff
>
> ,"Kevin B. Hendricks" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just to have a bit of fun, how about this (3 different systems)
> > Each generates a different md5sum but all generate the same cksum!
> > (and adding -b to md5sum makes no difference)
> >
> > Darwin khendricksmac 1.2 Darwin Kernel Version 1.2: Wed Aug 30 23:32:53
PDT 2000; root:xnu/xnu-103.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC  Power Macintosh powerpc
> >
> > [khendricksmac:~] kbhend% md5sum oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > 9c6a44ad66572c834e282eb1ec665374  oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > [khendricksmac:~] kbhend% cksum oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > 2458761606 56057947 oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> >
> > SunOS crunch 5.7 Generic_106541-04 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-250
> >
> > kbhend$ md5sum oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > 278c21a764126027cba9cb685b7e96cf  oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > kbhend$ cksum oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > 2458761606      56057947        oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> >
> > Linux localhost 2.2.17pre10-ben2 #3 Sun Aug 13 13:03:45 EDT 2000 ppc
unknown
> >
> > [kbhend@localhost /src2]$ md5sum oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > c4a5d7bda6973f6b56e725295d1b3dfb  oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > [kbhend@localhost /src2]$ cksum oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> > 2458761606 56057947 oo619b_src.tar.bz2
> >
> > I guess md5sum is not a very reliable or consistent checksum measure for
moving
> > files between ppc linux, MacOSX, and Solaris 7 Sparc.
> >
> > Back to the old cksum for me.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
>
> --
> ************************************************
>
> Jeffrey Hawkins
> Senior Staff Software Engineer
> Motorola Wireless Data Solutions Engineering
>
> Address: DEPT:  DQ525
>          MS:    IL-02-1055A              .-.
>          1301 East Algonquin Road        /v\
>          Schaumburg, IL 60196           // \\
>                                        /(   )\
> Phone:   (847)576-7463                  ^^ ^^
> FAX:     (847)576-7737
>
> ************************************************
>

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-22 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-22 18:57 do md5sums differ across architectures? Kevin B. Hendricks
2001-02-22 20:09 ` Jeffrey Hawkins
2001-02-22 21:13   ` Kevin B. Hendricks [this message]
2001-02-22 22:12     ` Kevin B. Hendricks
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-22 16:03 Kevin B. Hendricks
2001-02-22 17:12 ` mod+linuxppc-embedded
2001-02-22 15:24 Kevin B. Hendricks
2001-02-22 15:49 ` Ethan Benson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01022216133800.04317@localhost \
    --to=khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca \
    --cc=Jeffrey.F.Hawkins@motorola.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).