From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: August Hoerandl Reply-To: ahoerandl@gmx.at To: Brad Bonkoski , ppc-embed Subject: Re: Ethernet on 8260 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:28:42 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" References: <20010717002518.YUJE5550.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cx263713-b.mesa1.az.home.com> In-Reply-To: <20010717002518.YUJE5550.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cx263713-b.mesa1.az.home.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071710284300.00821@linuxhoe> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tuesday 17 July 2001 02:19 am, Brad Bonkoski wrote: > Hello, > > I am working with a custom 8260 board which has 3 Ethernet devices that > are on using FCC to communicate. When I try to activate all three I get > some funny routing. Essentailly, I have them all set up on the same > network: 192.168.0.X. When I try to ping one Ethernet device, the > system tries to respond on another. What could lead to this problem? you should not put more then one "real" device into one subnet - the kernel will always check with the netmask and use the first one that matches, there is no idea of "the request was on eth2, the answer has to go out on eth2" hth Gustl ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/