From: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov)
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: VT82C686B IDE and Linux/PPC woes
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 01 10:27:58 PST [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0111271827.AA24645@ivan.Harhan.ORG> (raw)
Adrian Cox <adrian@humboldt.co.uk> wrote:
> You're probably lacking the other IDE setup functions as well, then.
> Take a look at the sandpoint code as an example.
No, the problem turned out to be elsewhere. I just got it to work, and I didn't
need any more IDE functions in my board port except the ppcmd.ide_init_hwif I
posted. It saw the drive when I removed the pciauto_bus_scan() calls from my
adir_find_bridges, i.e., let it inherit the PCI enumeration from StarMON and
not re-enumerate it again. I have to admit that the Adirondack memory map is
fragile. It works as we've made it work in our firmware, and my hardware/
firmware manual warns against changing it. I can see how Linux redoing its own
PCI enumeration turns out not good in this case.
Now to change the Adirondack port to not use pciauto_bus_scan() I'll have to
make a few other changes to its memory map, and I'd rather do it all at once.
I'll post the patch when I have it.
MS
P.S. When I took the pciauto_bus_scan() calls out, it saw the drive, but hung
on the partition check. Disabling the VIA82CXXX support .config and leaving
only the generic PCI IDE support made it really work. I guess the VIA82CXXX
fast modes code still has issues to be worked out. Maybe it's because it
assumes there is a BIOS and in my case there isn't one. (My minimalist firmware
does not touch any VT82C686B IDE stuff at all, and yet if I want I can pull the
IDE register addresses out of the BARs and see the drive there using ancient
WD100x code.)
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2001-11-27 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-27 18:27 Michael Sokolov [this message]
2001-11-27 19:01 ` VT82C686B IDE and Linux/PPC woes Adrian Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-27 17:10 Michael Sokolov
2001-11-27 17:26 ` Adrian Cox
2001-11-26 22:05 Michael Sokolov
2001-11-26 23:35 ` Adrian Cox
2001-11-27 2:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-11-26 21:26 Michael Sokolov
2001-11-26 22:04 ` mod+linuxppc-embedded
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0111271827.AA24645@ivan.Harhan.ORG \
--to=msokolov@ivan.harhan.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).