linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* A little fix
@ 2001-11-27 22:36 Michael Sokolov
  2001-11-28  7:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sokolov @ 2001-11-27 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


OK, I goofed. It's struct bi_record, not struct bootinfo. I have no idea how I
could have screwed it up and how could the compiler have missed it. Is it
another gcc extension to allow struct never_heard_of * as OK? The patch below
fixes it. It also fixes a remaining bit of the kernel=>platforms rename.

MS

diff --minimal -Nru a/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c b/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c
--- a/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
+++ b/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
@@ -58,13 +58,13 @@
 extern void gunzip(void *, int, unsigned char *, int *);
 extern void setup_legacy(void);

-struct bootinfo *
+struct bi_record *
 decompress_kernel(unsigned long load_addr, int num_words, unsigned long cksum)
 {
 	int timer = 0;
 	char *cp, ch;
 	struct bi_record *rec;
-	struct bootinfo *birecs;
+	struct bi_record *birecs;

 	setup_legacy();
 	com_port = serial_init(0, NULL);
diff --minimal -Nru a/arch/ppc/platforms/adir_setup.c b/arch/ppc/platforms/adir_setup.c
--- a/arch/ppc/platforms/adir_setup.c	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
+++ b/arch/ppc/platforms/adir_setup.c	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
 	/*
 	 * On the Adirondack we use bi_recs and pass the pointer to them in R3.
 	 */
-	parse_bootinfo((struct bootinfo *) (r3 + KERNELBASE));
+	parse_bootinfo((struct bi_record *) (r3 + KERNELBASE));

 	/* Remember, isa_io_base is virtual but isa_mem_base is physical! */
 	isa_io_base = ADIR_PCI32_VIRT_IO_BASE;
diff --minimal -Nru a/arch/ppc/platforms/k2.h b/arch/ppc/platforms/k2.h
--- a/arch/ppc/platforms/k2.h	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
+++ b/arch/ppc/platforms/k2.h	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
  * option) any later version.
  */

-#ifndef __PPC_KERNEL_K2_H
-#define __PPC_KERNEL_K2_H
+#ifndef __PPC_PLATFORMS_K2_H
+#define __PPC_PLATFORMS_K2_H

 /*
  * SBS K2 definitions
@@ -81,4 +81,4 @@

 #define K2_SYS_SLOT_MASK	0x08

-#endif /* __PPC_KERNEL_K2_H */
+#endif /* __PPC_PLATFORMS_K2_H */
diff --minimal -Nru a/arch/ppc/platforms/k2_setup.c b/arch/ppc/platforms/k2_setup.c
--- a/arch/ppc/platforms/k2_setup.c	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
+++ b/arch/ppc/platforms/k2_setup.c	Tue Nov 27 14:21:26 2001
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@
 void __init platform_init(unsigned long r3, unsigned long r4,
 		unsigned long r5, unsigned long r6, unsigned long r7)
 {
-	parse_bootinfo((struct bootinfo *) (r3 + KERNELBASE));
+	parse_bootinfo((struct bi_record *) (r3 + KERNELBASE));

 	isa_io_base = K2_ISA_IO_BASE;
 	isa_mem_base = K2_ISA_MEM_BASE;

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: A little fix
  2001-11-27 22:36 A little fix Michael Sokolov
@ 2001-11-28  7:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2001-11-28  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:36:12PM -0800, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> OK, I goofed. It's struct bi_record, not struct bootinfo. I have no idea how I
> could have screwed it up and how could the compiler have missed it. Is it
> another gcc extension to allow struct never_heard_of * as OK? The patch below
> fixes it. It also fixes a remaining bit of the kernel=>platforms rename.

That's not a GCC extension, it's standard C, actually.  It's an opaque
type.


--
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: A little fix
@ 2001-11-28 17:05 Michael Sokolov
  2001-11-28 23:44 ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sokolov @ 2001-11-28 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


Tom,

I think you've goofed a little bit again:

ChangeSet@1.699, 2001-11-27 15:44:22-07:00, trini@opus.bloom.county
  'bootinfo' is wrong, 'bi_record' is right, whoops.

  arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c
    1.12 01/11/27 15:44:21 trini@opus.bloom.county +3 -5
    struct bootinfo -> struct bi_record.

After this change misc-simple.c doesn't compile due to a missing semicolon, and
even if it compiled it would return the wrong address (we need the start of
bi_recs, not the end). The fix is below.

MS

diff --minimal -Nru a/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c b/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c
--- a/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c	Wed Nov 28 08:53:35 2001
+++ b/arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c	Wed Nov 28 08:53:35 2001
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@
 {
 	int timer = 0;
 	char *cp, ch;
-	struct bi_record *rec
+	struct bi_record *rec;
+	struct bi_record *birecs;

 	setup_legacy();
 	com_port = serial_init(0, NULL);
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@
 	 */
 	rec = (struct bi_record *)_ALIGN((unsigned long)(zimage_size) +
 			(1 << 20) - 1, (1 << 20));
+	birecs = rec;

 	rec->tag = BI_FIRST;
 	rec->size = sizeof(struct bi_record);
@@ -184,5 +186,5 @@
 	rec = (struct bi_record *)((unsigned long)rec + rec->size);
 	puts("Now booting the kernel\n");

-	return rec;
+	return birecs;
 }

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: A little fix
  2001-11-28 17:05 Michael Sokolov
@ 2001-11-28 23:44 ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2001-11-28 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Sokolov; +Cc: linuxppc-dev


On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:05:56AM -0800, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> I think you've goofed a little bit again:
>
> ChangeSet@1.699, 2001-11-27 15:44:22-07:00, trini@opus.bloom.county
>   'bootinfo' is wrong, 'bi_record' is right, whoops.
>
>   arch/ppc/boot/common/misc-simple.c
>     1.12 01/11/27 15:44:21 trini@opus.bloom.county +3 -5
>     struct bootinfo -> struct bi_record.
>
> After this change misc-simple.c doesn't compile due to a missing semicolon, and
> even if it compiled it would return the wrong address (we need the start of
> bi_recs, not the end). The fix is below.

D'oh.  Not my day... Thanks.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-28 23:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-27 22:36 A little fix Michael Sokolov
2001-11-28  7:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-28 17:05 Michael Sokolov
2001-11-28 23:44 ` Tom Rini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).