From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsheeley@austin.rr.com Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 16:34:23 -0600 (CST) Reply-To: nsheeley@austin.rr.com Subject: semaphore-helper.h To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-ID: <013092421221829FE5@mail5.austin.rr.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: I just checked out the current CVS from :pserver:cvs@cvs.samba.org:/cvsroot All seems well until I try to do a make: make[2]: Entering directory `/local/src/CVS_kernel/linux/kernel' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/local/src/CVS_kernel/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__powerpc__ -fsigned-char -msoft-float -pipe -fno-builtin -ffixed-r2 -Wno-uninitialized -mmultiple -mstring -fno-omit-frame-pointer -c -o sched.o sched.c sched.c:39: asm/semaphore-helper.h: No such file or directory Hmm.. only three arch's asm-includes have semaphore-helper.h (i386, sparc, sparc64), but its not ifdef'ed in any way in sched.c So my question are: a. Should I expect to be able to CVS checkout and make a working kernel? I am wondering about the stability of the tree -- what's my percent chance that I won't have to debug anything? b. If yes to a., does anyone have a patch for the above problem. Thanks. Nate [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]