From: "Matt Sealey" <matt@genesi-usa.com>
To: "'Paul Mackerras'" <paulus@samba.org>, <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: Who cares about PReP?
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:00:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <013401c6bbc4$9d2acd90$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17622.58559.879330.496619@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
QEMU PPC implements a PReP system too.
Probably a good place to test without needing a real system.
However it's the kind of thing you'd want to throw a CHRP
ROM onto in the end, and forget PReP for emulation (after
all, nobody makes 'em anymore).
--
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Manager, Genesi, Developer Relations
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+matt=genesi-usa.com@ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+matt=genesi-usa.com@ozlabs.org]
> On Behalf Of Paul Mackerras
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:59 AM
> To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Who cares about PReP?
>
> I started looking at moving the PReP code over to
> arch/powerpc. I am struck by how many ifdefs there are in
> there to set things up for particular individual PReP
> implementations. We can do better than that, I'm sure, but
> the issue becomes one of testing. The only PReP I have here
> is an RS/6000 43p-140.
>
> Who else has a PReP system and would be willing to do some
> testing and debugging? If so, what sort of PReP is it?
>
> Paul.
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-09 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-07 6:59 Who cares about PReP? Paul Mackerras
2006-08-07 7:26 ` Olaf Hering
2006-08-07 9:27 ` Xavier Grave
2006-08-08 14:05 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-09 15:00 ` Matt Sealey [this message]
2006-08-16 10:15 ` Gabriel Paubert
2006-08-16 11:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-16 11:57 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-17 17:16 ` Marc Dietrich
2006-08-17 17:18 ` Marvin
[not found] <mailman.2127.1155045931.11183.linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
2006-08-09 4:02 ` Ed Goforth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-09 5:08 Robert Brose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='013401c6bbc4$9d2acd90$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net' \
--to=matt@genesi-usa.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).