From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.genesippc.com (mithrandir.softwarenexus.net [66.98.186.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5AD679E9 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:00:56 +1000 (EST) From: "Matt Sealey" To: "'Paul Mackerras'" , Subject: RE: Who cares about PReP? Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:00:50 +0200 Message-ID: <013401c6bbc4$9d2acd90$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <17622.58559.879330.496619@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Reply-To: matt@genesi-usa.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , QEMU PPC implements a PReP system too. Probably a good place to test without needing a real system. However it's the kind of thing you'd want to throw a CHRP ROM onto in the end, and forget PReP for emulation (after all, nobody makes 'em anymore). -- Matt Sealey Manager, Genesi, Developer Relations > -----Original Message----- > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+matt=genesi-usa.com@ozlabs.org > [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+matt=genesi-usa.com@ozlabs.org] > On Behalf Of Paul Mackerras > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:59 AM > To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Subject: Who cares about PReP? > > I started looking at moving the PReP code over to > arch/powerpc. I am struck by how many ifdefs there are in > there to set things up for particular individual PReP > implementations. We can do better than that, I'm sure, but > the issue becomes one of testing. The only PReP I have here > is an RS/6000 43p-140. > > Who else has a PReP system and would be willing to do some > testing and debugging? If so, what sort of PReP is it? > > Paul. > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev >