From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.embeddedspecialties.com (mail.embeddedspecialties.com [74.94.113.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0962DDE26 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:47:58 +1000 (EST) From: "Joe Hamman" To: "'Kumar Gala'" References: <1187044669.10295.4.camel@server><3FE16C0A-892F-4481-999A-A699C0C70BF9@kernel.crashing.org> <013b01c7de23$5baa7d70$6f00a8c0@ESIDT> Subject: RE: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be configurable Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:47:51 -0500 Message-ID: <016c01c7de71$53f9d0a0$6f00a8c0@ESIDT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <013b01c7de23$5baa7d70$6f00a8c0@ESIDT> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Reply-To: joe.hamman@embeddedspecialties.com List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Kumar, Or do you think it should be added to gianfar_mdio_data? Easier, but does it belong there? Thanks, Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: linuxppc-embedded- > bounces+joe.hamman=embeddedspecialties.com@ozlabs.org [mailto:linuxppc- > embedded-bounces+joe.hamman=embeddedspecialties.com@ozlabs.org] On Behalf > Of Joe Hamman > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:30 PM > To: 'Kumar Gala' > Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be > configurable > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:10 PM > > To: joe.hamman@embeddedspecialties.com > > Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be > > configurable > > > > > > On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Joe Hamman wrote: > > > > > Allow the address of the Ten Bit Interface (TBI) to be changed in the > > > event of a conflict with another device. > > > > > > Signed-off by: Joe Hamman > > > --- > > > > > > Please ignore the last patch - I missed a cut & paste error on the > > > range > > > that my testing didn't catch. > > > > I think we'd rather this came from the device tree. > > > Duh, that makes sense ;-) > > Has there been any discussion yet? Maybe something like this: > > mdio@24520 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > device_type = "mdio"; > compatible = "gianfar"; > reg = <24520 20>; > phy0: ethernet-phy@0 { > interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; > interrupts = ; > reg = <0>; > device_type = "ethernet-phy"; > }; > phy1: ethernet-phy@1 { > interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; > interrupts = ; > reg = <1>; > device_type = "ethernet-phy"; > }; > phy2: ethernet-phy@2 { > interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; > interrupts = ; > reg = <2>; > device_type = "ethernet-phy"; > }; > phy3: ethernet-phy@3 { > interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; > interrupts = ; > reg = <3>; > device_type = "ethernet-phy"; > }; > tbi: ethernet-tbi@1f { > reg = <1f>; > device_type = "ethernet-tbi"; > }; > }; > > Thanks, > Joe > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded