From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <01C0692A.FCFDAC80@NB1> From: torsten.rissel@t-online.de (Torsten Rissel) To: "'Gabriel Paubert'" , Matt Porter Cc: Torsten Rissel , "Linuxppc-Embedded (E-Mail)" Subject: AW: MVME 5100 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:44:49 +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: ??? So would it be better to use the CHRP settings to build a kernel for the MVME5100 ? Torsten -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: Gabriel Paubert [SMTP:paubert@iram.es] Gesendet am: Montag, 18. Dezember 2000 19:08 An: Matt Porter Cc: Torsten Rissel; Linuxppc-Embedded (E-Mail) Betreff: Re: MVME 5100 On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Matt Porter wrote: > > On the MVME2400 (and older Raven/Falcon based boards) the config space by > > default is at 0x80000cf8 and 0x8000cfc. Does it mean that on the MVME5100, > > the Hawk is reprogrammed by PPCBUG to look like a CHRP system ? > > Yes...and Yes. :) The only thing the newer MCG boards really do > (correctly) that looks like a PReP system is the disk booting > mechanism. > > BTW, the MVME2100 (8240/Universe II board) is put in map B for a CHRP > map as well. Ok, fine. It means that my code to reprogram the Raven/Hawk on 2[467]xx just makes things more uniform. I still don't like the fact that the DMA is offset, though (unless it's a residual data bug, and map B on 106/107 does not have this DMA offset). Regards, Gabriel. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/