From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "ykaliuta@redhat.com" <ykaliuta@redhat.com>,
"johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com"
<johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] powerpc64/bpf elfv2: Setup kernel TOC in r2 on entry
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:43:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01d558b9-82b7-f73e-70d6-d19a192d47b6@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <080527ac-54f2-6e41-17a0-fdb7a556c30d@csgroup.eu>
Le 11/01/2022 à 15:35, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>
>
> Le 11/01/2022 à 11:31, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
>> Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 06/01/2022 à 12:45, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
>>>> In preparation for using kernel TOC, load the same in r2 on entry. With
>>>> elfv1, the kernel TOC is already setup by our caller so we just emit a
>>>> nop. We adjust the number of instructions to skip on a tail call
>>>> accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 +++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>>> b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>>> index ce4fc59bbd6a92..e05b577d95bf11 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>>> @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct
>>>> codegen_context *ctx)
>>>> {
>>>> int i;
>>>> +#ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2
>>>> + PPC_BPF_LL(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc));
>>>> +#else
>>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Can we avoid the #ifdef, using
>>>
>>> if (__is_defined(PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2))
>>> PPC_BPF_LL(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc));
>>> else
>>> EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
>>
>> Hmm... that doesn't work for me. Is __is_defined() expected to work with
>> macros other than CONFIG options?
>
> Yes, __is_defined() should work with any item.
>
> It is IS_ENABLED() which is supposed to work only with CONFIG options.
>
> See commit 5c189c523e78 ("powerpc/time: Fix mftb()/get_tb() for use with
> the compat VDSO")
>
> Or commit ca5999fde0a1 ("mm: introduce include/linux/pgtable.h")
Ah ... wait.
It seems it expects a macro set to 1.
So it would require arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h to be modified to
define PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 or PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 as 1
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 11:45 [PATCH 00/13] powerpc/bpf: Some fixes and updates Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 01/13] bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack() Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-07 10:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-10 8:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-10 10:36 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 02/13] powerpc32/bpf: Fix codegen for bpf-to-bpf calls Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-10 9:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-10 10:52 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 03/13] powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-08 14:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-10 9:27 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-10 10:56 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/13] tools/bpf: Rename 'struct event' to avoid naming conflict Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-07 10:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 05/13] powerpc/bpf: Skip branch range validation during first pass Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 06/13] powerpc/bpf: Emit a single branch instruction for known short branch ranges Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 07/13] powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXIT Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 08/13] powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06 Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 09/13] powerpc64/bpf: Do not save/restore LR on each call to bpf_stf_barrier() Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 10/13] powerpc64/bpf: Use r12 for constant blinding Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 11/13] powerpc64/bpf elfv2: Setup kernel TOC in r2 on entry Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-10 9:20 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-11 10:31 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-11 14:35 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-11 14:43 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-01-14 11:17 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 12/13] powerpc64/bpf elfv1: Do not load TOC before calling functions Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 11:45 ` [PATCH 13/13] powerpc64/bpf: Optimize instruction sequence used for function calls Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-06 21:46 ` [PATCH 00/13] powerpc/bpf: Some fixes and updates Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-07 7:36 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-01-07 10:20 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-01-10 3:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-01-16 10:41 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01d558b9-82b7-f73e-70d6-d19a192d47b6@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=ykaliuta@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).