From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tmnt04.transmode.se (mail.transmode.se [83.241.175.147]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8069DDDFB for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:38:29 +1000 (EST) From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: "'Scott Wood'" , "'Rune Torgersen'" Subject: RE: Porting to /arch/powerpc Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:26:17 +0200 Message-ID: <020001c81756$0fc78760$5267a8c0@Jocke> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <472113CC.5020409@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > -----Original Message----- > From: > linuxppc-embedded-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=lumentis.se@ozlabs. > org > [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=lumentis.se > @ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Scott Wood > Sent: den 26 oktober 2007 00:08 > To: Rune Torgersen > Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: Porting to /arch/powerpc > > Rune Torgersen wrote: > > Is there a good platform/documents to look at for doing a board port > > from arch/ppc to arch/powerpc? > > I'm porting a 8266/8280 based board with PCI and 2 FCC ethernets > > connected phy-less to a switch. > > Look at head-of-tree for 82xx stuff (lots of changes since 2.6.23)... > any of the 82xx boards in arch/powerpc should be good to look at. > > The fs_enet driver doesn't currently support phy-less > directly, but you > may be able to do something with the fixed phy driver. How is PHY less support supposed to be impl.? I would like to do the same for ucc_geth. I once sent a patch that made the PHY optional, but it never made into the driver. Jocke > > -Scott