From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 02 12:23:57 PDT From: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov) Message-Id: <0204091923.AA23957@ivan.Harhan.ORG> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Incoming to helium.harhan.org:/home/linuxppc/linuxppc_2_4_alt Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: > Well, take a look at what the file used to look like in _devel. It was > around 30-40 lines of that. Which is not nice to look at. So what's more important, a pretty look or better functionality for the user? > Well, it's a much better system if you want to group unlike hardware > together in one kernel. :) Which is what I want to do, and which is the RTTD for distributions like Debian. > Well, if ISA slots exist on the board, and should be working, they > should just work. And when BenH merges in prep/chrp, it'll be needed. > But the question is do you really want to offer this up on machines > where it's not tested? I want to have configurable CONFIG_PCI and CONFIG_ISA support for CONFIG_GENERIC_PPC32. Generic means that things like this must be configurable. MS ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/