From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tmnt04.transmode.se (mail.transmode.se [83.241.175.147]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E19DDEBA for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:03:37 +1000 (EST) From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: "'Scott Wood'" , "Li Yang" Subject: RE: Porting to /arch/powerpc Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:03:31 +0200 Message-ID: <022b01c81802$e6ba9d50$5267a8c0@Jocke> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <47222D86.1000502@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottwood@freescale.com] > Sent: den 26 oktober 2007 20:10 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: 'Rune Torgersen'; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: Porting to /arch/powerpc > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >> The fs_enet driver doesn't currently support phy-less > >> directly, but you > >> may be able to do something with the fixed phy driver. > > > > How is PHY less support supposed to be impl.? I would like > > to do the same for ucc_geth. I once sent a patch that made > > the PHY optional, but it never made into the driver. > > Basically, the driver needs to assume the link is up if there's no > phy-handle in the device tree, rather than error out. > > -Scott Right, that was what I did, but I think Leo didn't want it at the time. Leo? Jocke