From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <026501bed2d7$042f4180$232cd8c2@scigen.co.uk> From: "Neil Piercy" To: "Tom Rini" , "Johnnie Peters" Cc: "Matt Porter" , "VALETTE Eric" , References: Subject: Re: Is the vger 2.2 kernel branch dead Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 18:40:53 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Rini To: Johnnie Peters Cc: Matt Porter ; VALETTE Eric ; Sent: 19 July 1999 23:47 Subject: Re: Is the vger 2.2 kernel branch dead > On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote: > > Try putting 'em vs 2.3.x. I think right now the push is to fix all the > little annoyances/problems that we're stuck w/ in 2.2.x and move forward > in 2.3.x. Then backport things later on. I thought 2.2.x was meant to be the stable branch and 2.3.x the dev ? It seems strange to back-port fixes to known bugs in the stable branch from a dev branch which is frequently broken - or do I misunderstand ? Stable doesnt equal frozen in my book. Neil > --- > Tom Rini (TR1265) > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]