From: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Make the acquire/release of the drc for memory a seperate step
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:25:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02d198a9-5e64-74df-ac30-dec0a8a05ecc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4c3e5c2-18d8-0f01-272b-a3ae23318469@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
When adding and removing LMBs we should make the acquire/release of
the DRC a separate step to allow for a few improvements. First
this will ensure that LMBs removed during a remove by count operation
are all available if a error occurs and we need to add them back. By
first removeing all the LMBs from the kernel before releasing their
DRCs the LMBs are available to add back should an error occur.
Also, this will allow for faster re-add operations of memory for
PRRN event handling since we can skip the unneeded step of having
to release the DRC and the acquire it back.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
index 76ec104..0eb4b1d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
@@ -446,9 +446,7 @@ static int dlpar_remove_lmb(struct of_drconf_cell *lmb)
/* Update memory regions for memory remove */
memblock_remove(lmb->base_addr, block_sz);
- dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
dlpar_remove_device_tree_lmb(lmb);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -513,6 +511,7 @@ static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_count(u32 lmbs_to_remove,
if (!lmbs[i].reserved)
continue;
+ dlpar_release_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
pr_info("Memory at %llx was hot-removed\n",
lmbs[i].base_addr);
@@ -542,6 +541,9 @@ static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index, struct property *prop)
if (lmbs[i].drc_index == drc_index) {
lmb_found = 1;
rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+ if (!rc)
+ dlpar_release_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
+
break;
}
}
@@ -596,10 +598,6 @@ static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct of_drconf_cell *lmb)
if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)
return -EINVAL;
- rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(lmb->drc_index);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
rc = dlpar_add_device_tree_lmb(lmb);
if (rc) {
pr_err("Couldn't update device tree for drc index %x\n",
@@ -615,12 +613,10 @@ static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct of_drconf_cell *lmb)
/* Add the memory */
rc = add_memory(nid, lmb->base_addr, block_sz);
- if (rc) {
+ if (rc)
dlpar_remove_device_tree_lmb(lmb);
- dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
- } else {
+ else
lmb->flags |= DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED;
- }
return rc;
}
@@ -652,10 +648,16 @@ static int dlpar_memory_add_by_count(u32 lmbs_to_add, struct property *prop)
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < num_lmbs && lmbs_to_add != lmbs_added; i++) {
- rc = dlpar_add_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+ rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
if (rc)
continue;
+ rc = dlpar_add_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+ if (rc) {
+ dlpar_release_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
+ continue;
+ }
+
lmbs_added++;
/* Mark this lmb so we can remove it later if all of the
@@ -675,6 +677,8 @@ static int dlpar_memory_add_by_count(u32 lmbs_to_add, struct property *prop)
if (rc)
pr_err("Failed to remove LMB, drc index %x\n",
be32_to_cpu(lmbs[i].drc_index));
+ else
+ dlpar_release_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
}
rc = -EINVAL;
} else {
@@ -708,7 +712,13 @@ static int dlpar_memory_add_by_index(u32 drc_index, struct property *prop)
for (i = 0; i < num_lmbs; i++) {
if (lmbs[i].drc_index == drc_index) {
lmb_found = 1;
- rc = dlpar_add_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+ rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
+ if (!rc) {
+ rc = dlpar_add_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+ if (rc)
+ dlpar_release_drc(lmbs[i].drc_index);
+ }
+
break;
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-06 19:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] powerpc/pseries: Perform PRRN topology updates in kernel John Allen
2017-01-06 19:25 ` John Allen [this message]
2017-02-02 11:45 ` [v3, 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Make the acquire/release of the drc for memory a seperate step Michael Ellerman
2017-01-06 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/pseries: Introduce memory hotplug READD operation John Allen
2017-01-09 16:32 ` Nathan Fontenot
2017-01-06 19:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/pseries: Update affinity for memory and cpus specified in a PRRN event John Allen
2017-01-09 16:32 ` Nathan Fontenot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02d198a9-5e64-74df-ac30-dec0a8a05ecc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).