LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
To: "'Andy Fleming'" <afleming@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, 'Jeff Garzik' <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Slight refactor of interrupt mapping for FSL parts
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:40:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02d901c6f3cf$8952e990$1267a8c0@Jocke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E86BE632-0841-4572-BE65-C308B0E0BF78@freescale.com>

> 
> On Oct 16, 2006, at 16:51, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> 
> >>> -#define PHY_POLL		-1
> >>> +#define PHY_POLL		NO_IRQ
> >>>  #define PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT	-2
> >
> > What does PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT mean? Can I use that in a dummy PHY
> > driver that just pretends that all is well? Got a ethernet port that
> > is connect to a switch directly over MII.
> > How do I express -2 in a dts file?
> 
> 
> PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT means that the PHY Lib will not poll the  
> interface, nor will it register for the interrupt.  Actually, it  
> would be best for a dummy PHY driver.  Take a look at the driver in  
> drivers/phy/fixed.c.  It's there to provide that kind of interface.   
> It looks like it uses -1, which is a problem, but my revision 
> of this  
> patch will fix that.

Great, thanks. I don't see how to connect this PHY to ucc_geth driver yet. I think
it needs some PHY work first.

Maybe this patch,http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2006-October/026690.html, will make it better?
Why hasn't it been applied yet?

 Jocke

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-19 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16 20:57 [PATCH] Slight refactor of interrupt mapping for FSL parts Andy Fleming
2006-10-16 21:37 ` Kumar Gala
2006-10-16 21:51   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2006-10-18 13:50     ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-10-19 19:14     ` Andy Fleming
2006-10-19 22:40       ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
2006-10-20  0:54         ` Andy Fleming
2006-10-16 21:54   ` Kumar Gala
2006-10-16 22:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-17  6:27 Andy Fleming
2006-10-17 15:50 ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='02d901c6f3cf$8952e990$1267a8c0@Jocke' \
    --to=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox