From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3C9DDE30 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:12:03 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1180905120.31677.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7fc919fce0761f861be3069a853d3169@bga.com> <4662EAA9.70104@ru.mvista.com> <1180905120.31677.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <03427692d8865878b0eb2a91e7f6969e@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Create "rom" (MTD) device prpmc2800 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:11:55 +0200 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Milton Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Regarding physical address ranges for the flash mapping, I suppose the > best is to define a property for flash chips for it. There is, namely "reg". How to best describe flash chips interleaved on the bus is still an open problem. And things like combining two sequential in address space flash chips into a virtual one, or describing flash "partitions" doesn't belong in the device tree at all; it is a policy thing, not a hardware thing. Segher