From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9682F67C7C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:08:43 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7EA18FDD2DC2154AA3BD6D2F22A62A0E26E5CF@zch01exm23.fsl.freescale.net> References: <7EA18FDD2DC2154AA3BD6D2F22A62A0E26E5CF@zch01exm23.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <06073868-B8CB-428A-8E57-70B436A0268B@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH ] powerpc: pass UPIO_TSI flag to 8259 serial driver Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:08:33 -0500 To: "Zang Roy-r61911" Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Paul Mackerras , Yang Xin-Xin-r48390 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:27 AM, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote: >> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote: >> >>> The patch passes the UPIO_TSI flag to general 8259 serial driver >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roy Zang >> >> Maybe, I'm missing something, but why do we need this? Why >> doesn't iotype == UPIO_MEM work for the TSI? >> >> - kumar >> > > Tsi108 serial port has some difference from the standard 8250 port. > I add UPIO_TSI in general 8250 serial driver to handle IIR and IER > register > in serial_in and serial_out. Gotcha, that makes sense now. - k