linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Luming Yu <luming.yu@shingroup.cn>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "shenghui.qu@shingroup.cn" <shenghui.qu@shingroup.cn>,
	"dawei.li@shingroup.cn" <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>,
	"luming.yu@gmail.com" <luming.yu@gmail.com>,
	"ke.zhao@shingroup.cn" <ke.zhao@shingroup.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] powerpc/debug: hook to user return notifier infrastructure
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:02:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0638f0a2-782b-411f-9937-c62d99e9562b@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2acd6623-952b-4659-bc26-c632e94560a8@csgroup.eu>



Le 20/02/2024 à 09:51, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> 
> 
> Le 19/12/2023 à 07:33, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> writes:
>>> Luming Yu <luming.yu@shingroup.cn> writes:
>>>
>>>> Before we have powerpc to use the generic entry infrastructure,
>>>> the call to fire user return notifier is made temporarily in powerpc
>>>> entry code.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is still not clear what will be registered as user return notifier.
>>> Can you summarize that here?
>>
>> fire_user_return_notifiers() is defined in kernel/user-return-notifier.c
>>
>> That's built when CONFIG_USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER=y.
>>
>> That is not user selectable, it's only enabled by:
>>
>> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig:        select USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER
>>
>> So it looks to me like (currently) it's always a nop and does nothing.
>>
>> Which makes me wonder what the point of wiring this feature up is :)
>> Maybe it's needed for some other feature I don't know about?
>>
>> Arguably we could just enable it because we can, and it currently does
>> nothing so it's unlikely to break anything. But that also makes it
>> impossible to test the implementation is correct, and runs the risk that
>> one day in the future when it does get enabled only then do we discover
>> it doesn't work.
> 
> Opened an "issue" for the day we need it:
> https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/348

Correct one is https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/477

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-20  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-18  3:13 [PATCH v1 2/2] powerpc/debug: hook to user return notifier infrastructure Luming Yu
2023-12-18  9:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-12-19  6:33   ` Michael Ellerman
2024-02-20  8:51     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-02-20  9:02       ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-08-28  3:17         ` 虞陆铭
2024-08-28  5:46           ` Christophe Leroy
2024-08-28  6:50             ` Luming Yu
2024-08-28  7:27               ` Christophe Leroy
2024-08-29  9:58                 ` Luming Yu
2024-09-02  8:34                 ` Luming Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0638f0a2-782b-411f-9937-c62d99e9562b@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
    --cc=ke.zhao@shingroup.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luming.yu@gmail.com \
    --cc=luming.yu@shingroup.cn \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=shenghui.qu@shingroup.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).