From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] mm: sparse: set/clear subsection bitmap when pages are onlined/offlined.
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 19:48:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06dfaf69-1173-462c-b85f-8715cb8d108c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506152623.178731-2-zi.yan@sent.com>
On 06.05.21 17:26, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> subsection bitmap was set/cleared when a section is added/removed, but
> pfn_to_online_page() uses subsection bitmap to check if the page is
> online, which is not accurate. It was working when a whole section is
> added/removed during memory hotplug and hotremove. When the following
> patches enable memory hotplug and hotremove for subsections,
> subsection bitmap needs to be changed during page online/offline time,
> otherwise, pfn_to_online_page() will not give right answers. Move the
> subsection bitmap manipulation code from section_activate() to
> online_mem_sections() and section_deactivate() to
> offline_mem_sections(), respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> mm/sparse.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index b2ada9dc00cb..7637208b8874 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>
> +static int fill_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
> /* Mark all memory sections within the pfn range as online */
> void online_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> @@ -621,9 +622,12 @@ void online_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>
> ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> ms->section_mem_map |= SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> + fill_subsection_map(pfn, min(end_pfn, pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION) - pfn);
> }
> }
>
> +static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
> +static bool is_subsection_map_empty(struct mem_section *ms);
> /* Mark all memory sections within the pfn range as offline */
> void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> @@ -641,7 +645,13 @@ void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> continue;
>
> ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> - ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> +
> + if (end_pfn < pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> + clear_subsection_map(pfn, end_pfn - pfn);
> + if (is_subsection_map_empty(ms))
> + ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> + } else
> + ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -668,6 +678,17 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
> vmemmap_free(start, end, NULL);
> }
>
> +static int subsection_map_intersects(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
> + unsigned long *subsection_map = &ms->usage->subsection_map[0];
> +
> + subsection_mask_set(map, pfn, nr_pages);
> +
> + return bitmap_intersects(map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> +}
> +
> static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
> @@ -760,6 +781,12 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
> }
> }
>
> +static int subsection_map_intersects(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> return 0;
> @@ -800,7 +827,10 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> struct page *memmap = NULL;
> bool empty;
>
> - if (clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages))
> + if (WARN((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) && !ms->usage) ||
> + subsection_map_intersects(ms, pfn, nr_pages),
> + "section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n",
> + pfn, nr_pages))
> return;
>
> empty = is_subsection_map_empty(ms);
> @@ -855,7 +885,7 @@ static struct page * __meminit section_activate(int nid, unsigned long pfn,
> ms->usage = usage;
> }
>
> - rc = fill_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages);
> + rc = !nr_pages || subsection_map_intersects(ms, pfn, nr_pages);
> if (rc) {
> if (usage)
> ms->usage = NULL;
>
If I am not missing something, this is completely broken for
devmem/ZONE_DEVICE that never onlines pages. But also when memory blocks
are never onlined, this would be just wrong. Least thing you would need
is a sub-section online map.
But glimpsing at patch #2, I'd rather stop right away digging deeper
into this series :)
I think what would really help is drafting a design of how it all could
look like and then first discussing the high-level design, investigating
how it could play along with all existing users, existing workloads, and
existing use cases. Proposing such changes without a clear picture in
mind and a high-level overview might give you some unpleasant reactions
from some of the developers around here ;)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 15:26 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Memory hotplug/hotremove at subsection size Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] mm: sparse: set/clear subsection bitmap when pages are onlined/offlined Zi Yan
2021-05-06 17:48 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-05-06 19:03 ` Zi Yan
2021-05-06 19:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] mm: set pageblock_order to the max of HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER and MAX_ORDER-1 Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] mm: memory_hotplug: decouple memory_block size with section size Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] mm: pageblock: allow set/unset migratetype for partial pageblock Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] mm: memory_hotplug, sparse: enable memory hotplug/hotremove subsections Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] arch: x86: no MAX_ORDER exceeds SECTION_SIZE check for 32bit vdso Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] [not for merge] mm: increase SECTION_SIZE_BITS to 31 Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:31 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] Memory hotplug/hotremove at subsection size David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 15:37 ` Zi Yan
2021-05-06 15:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 15:50 ` Zi Yan
2021-05-06 16:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:49 ` Zi Yan
2021-05-06 19:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 19:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-06 19:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 15:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-07 11:55 ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-07 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-10 14:36 ` Zi Yan
2021-05-12 16:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-02 15:56 ` Zi Yan
2021-06-14 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 15:42 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06dfaf69-1173-462c-b85f-8715cb8d108c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).