From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B479B6F34 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:13:26 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AFADDD0B for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:13:25 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <097D0457-BF1C-403A-A930-31807C296D2C@kernel.crashing.org> From: Becky Bruce To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1250374817.24143.71.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Poll: Rebasing of powerpc-next Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:13:18 -0500 References: <1250374817.24143.71.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Aug 15, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi ! > > I'd like to rebase powerpc-next ... a few bugs have been found that it > would be nice to fix in the original patch rather than introducing a > bisection breakage, and Kumar also just noticed a potentially > misleading > error in a commit message from his tree. > > So who is not ok with me doing that tomorrow or tuesday ? Sounds like a swell idea to me.... I hate bisection breakage. -Becky