From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C442DDDF00 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:00:07 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <0D92A341-7883-4339-8967-5B8B33DB099A@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: Martyn Welch In-Reply-To: <49BF6D55.7020108@gefanuc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/86xx: Board support for GE Fanuc's PPC9A Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:59:45 -0500 References: <20090316102912.10805.98764.stgit@ubuntu8041.localdomain> <20090316103048.10805.15368.stgit@ubuntu8041.localdomain> <20090317013918.GA9643@yookeroo.seuss> <49BF6D55.7020108@gefanuc.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Martyn Welch wrote: >>> >>> + i2c1: i2c@3000 { >>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>> + compatible = "fsl-i2c"; >> This should list include a compatible string specific to the >> particular SoC model before the general name. > > The documentation seems to suggest to use "fsl-i2c". Should it be > like this?: > > compatible = "fsl,mpc8641d-i2c", fsl-i2c"; in theory it should be, in practice don't bother. - k