linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	LinuxPPC-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next bad Kconfig for drivers/hid
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:00:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b83a8b65ef53f7892e639c89667af1b.squirrel@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE19DA0.5010705@goop.org>


On Thu, December 8, 2011 9:33 pm, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 05:27 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> Commit 4f5ca836bef3 (HID: hid-input: add support for HID devices
>> reporting Battery Strength) went into linux-next on Dec 1st since then a
>> ppc6xx_defconfig has been failing with:
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `hidinput_cleanup_battery':
>> /scratch/tony/working/drivers/hid/hid-input.c:351: undefined reference
>> to `power_supply_unregister'
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `hidinput_setup_battery':
>> /scratch/tony/working/drivers/hid/hid-input.c:338: undefined reference
>> to `power_supply_register'
>> make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>> ---
>>
>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5012563/
>> vs
>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5017366/
>>
>> The defconfig in question doens't mention either option
>> (CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY or CONFIG_HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH) and kbuild is
>> genertaing
>> CONFIG_HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH=y
>> CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY=m
>> which clearly isn't going to work.
>>
>> The following change to HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH Kconfig "works" but seems a
>> little gross.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> index 5ed64f6..d2a94e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config HID
>>
>>  config HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH
>>         bool
>> -       depends on POWER_SUPPLY
>> +       depends on POWER_SUPPLY=y
>>         default y
>>
>>  config HIDRAW
>>
>> Any chance we can get a fix into linux-next?
>
> Hm.  How about making it "depends on HID && POWER_SUPPLY"?  I think that
> would needlessly disable it if HID is also modular, but I'm not sure how
> to fix that.  "depends on HID && POWER_SUPPLY && HID == POWER_SUPPLY"?

The last suggestion looks good to me.

-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-09 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-09  1:27 linux-next bad Kconfig for drivers/hid Tony Breeds
2011-12-09  5:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-12-09 19:00   ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-12-11 23:21   ` Jiri Kosina
2011-12-12  0:31     ` Tony Breeds
2011-12-15 10:08       ` Jiri Kosina
2011-12-15 11:44         ` Tony Breeds
2011-12-15 17:43         ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b83a8b65ef53f7892e639c89667af1b.squirrel@xenotime.net \
    --to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).