From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc: fix preempt_count imbalances in perf and kexec paths
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 13:38:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c6d2855-61df-4fd2-bede-0c204f4fd2b1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518050855.1147242-1-aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Aboorva,
On 5/18/26 10:38 AM, Aboorva Devarajan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series fixes some minor preempt_count bookkeeping issues in
> arch/powerpc/ found during a preemption leak audit prompted by the
> lazy/full preemption model changes. These are get_cpu/put_cpu and
> get_cpu_var/put_cpu_var pairing errors that leave preempt_count
> incorrectly elevated or underflowed.
>
Thanks for fixing some of these.
while we do this, Can you fix these mismatch in preempt disable/enable in
below files as well.
1. kernel/kprobes.c - kprobe_handler - Does disable, but doesn't enable in some return paths.
A definite leak.
2. Maybe platforms/pseries/lpar.c and platforms/powernv/opal-tracepoints.c.
In __trace_hcall_entry/exit. It maybe a very corner case,
I don't see a big concern there. But it may be remotely possible.
Need to evaluate whether it should be fixed or not.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 5:08 [PATCH 0/3] powerpc: fix preempt_count imbalances in perf and kexec paths Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-18 5:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/perf: fix preempt count underflow in fsl_emb_pmu_del Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-18 6:13 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-03 5:59 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-18 5:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/powernv: fix preempt count leak in pnv_kexec_wait_secondaries_down Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-18 7:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-03 6:08 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-18 5:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kexec: fix double get_cpu() imbalance in kexec_prepare_cpus Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-18 6:02 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-03 6:14 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2026-06-03 6:16 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-18 8:08 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-06-03 6:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] powerpc: fix preempt_count imbalances in perf and kexec paths Aboorva Devarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c6d2855-61df-4fd2-bede-0c204f4fd2b1@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox