From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AEEC433EF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KX6JG3wDXz3bWD for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 20:21:34 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=russell.cc header.i=@russell.cc header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=Kab/PA7k; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=DC7CF18K; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=russell.cc (client-ip=66.111.4.25; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=ruscur@russell.cc; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=russell.cc header.i=@russell.cc header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=Kab/PA7k; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=DC7CF18K; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KX6HX18hmz2xdN for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 20:20:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5125C00B2; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:11:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Apr 2022 06:11:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russell.cc; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=wRznwEHucFDONc /kDuqRJqbkzM/SZZFsgTO46A84rJE=; b=Kab/PA7kxI+rTjY3MYdaO+4OSx5y8X 9F2S7HwTr3V1s2KvZvy7EfSjMMSplOu4wI5Uh2n+yccgthWs2hixkmHN4co6FsGi eAn3PANOEgd7Ga7NJZhmAyeSrNdrs+4g6AmZ8AcczLh6POFeOro4KrY8H0DZa0YB xoGSbffwQB/tAywROLOt8B427LJI4WdXcXhXZBJFtcXZxmWcms+oiZVUwhkBWBmI yenXM3/dfa/b5aGwvqr3DwjpOV3ipH3JbbyR8UN03ZA+F8UiOB6IFdxvgzdJsDTw 1bqXPqh83iMogLdJGDV8Eh85KhrIvfzQqvQDyDJVaADm21YX/ZecQEcA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wRznwEHucFDONc/kDuqRJqbkzM/SZZFsgTO46A84r JE=; b=DC7CF18KCo/OEmZJHmvHANxsW803LOORD1WXy/2UA53hVsaY5E0JInKXN pXhnabZJqJU/xAuA9KnU9C1oG/FPKtXMiTlSw4BAkHFFCIn2U3OHRPOAIArim9b+ +DiwqiqVQUHoqektoK962Jffgew1dsKHxD3dz3tEmBd0rVNQ/32mZduzxukh8fZV g/vLdz3L01sHnReypSWS0JzbLmM4U7d4K4ho6injf3ZfculzZ26xDgvuc0xlf13q s6pLP8xUOrnr8kBWqJBrbutNXNXXYfpqI8TVwnBbNxfjHWxhImY180YMb/kzyDJW RRY7LkLLiHlRuwM0FT1wrwQ/5L+GA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudejvddgvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdlfedtmdenucfjughrpefkuffhvfgjfhgtffggfgfgsehtkeertddt reejnecuhfhrohhmpeftuhhsshgvlhhlucevuhhrrhgvhicuoehruhhstghurhesrhhush hsvghllhdrtggtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffveffueevleeivedvveeugeehueeh hefgtefhvefhudeitdduieffveejudevvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehruhhstghurhesrhhushhsvghllhdrtggt X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:11:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <0c9c0f9e2030abfe60f24a7050437f7bd1c76e19.camel@russell.cc> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Get more flushing requirements from device-tree From: Russell Currey To: Murilo Opsfelder =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ara=FAjo?= , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: References: <20220322074734.107721-1-ruscur@russell.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:11:40 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: joel@jms.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 16:26 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote: > Hi, Russell. > > I think this patch could have been split in half with their > corresponding Fixes: tag. > > This may sound nitpicking but doing this would certainly help distros > doing their backports. Hi Murilo, I didn't use the Fixes: tag originally since as far as I'm aware this issue doesn't impact any systems "out in the wild" - so I didn't think there would be interest in any backports. I should have split and tagged the commits anyway though, in case others wanted to make that decision. Will resend.